Blog Navigation

The First Long-Term Cell Phone Health Study Launched By Europeans, Where Is The USA Study?


The Europeans have launched the first in terms of a long-term healthcare study on the affects of cell phone use. Where is the study in the United States though? It’s not there.
Five European nations launched what is the first study of any long-term magnitude on the potential side effects that might come from long term cell phone usage on one’s health. This is the culmination of a push of many years that have come from many different public interest groups as well as scientists to get both longer but also better studies on the potential health risks and effects of using cell phones.
The question really is though what is the United States doing, having 270 million cell phone users in the country, on this effort? Like said before, it’s not there, the United States federal government as well as the CTIA have been extremely quiet on this issue and simply points to the research that was done many years ago.
This research was done by the American Cancer Society and the World Health Organization. The zenith of their research was that there is no conclusive link between someone using a cell phone and getting cancer, or being in a higher risk category to get cancer. The one dragging thing in my mind with that though is that it doesn’t say anything about there not being a link and that there just hasn’t been enough research done to figure out if there actually is one or not.
This is where the advocates of putting warning labels on cell phones say there is a call to action with more research needed so those studies done can be updated, thus the need to capture cell phone usage over an extended amount of time and include their efforts to the effects on youth since they are the largest growing segment of cell phone use.
There are some efforts being made by some of the states to inform the users about the potential risks to children and to make an effort to better label cell phones with the specific rates of radiation absorption. There was a bill recently defeated in the Maine legislature that would have required cell phone manufacturers to put labels on phones for use by children. It was lobbied against heavily and the bill was defeated. Also defeated was a bill that was quite diluted of the original that didn’t call for warning labels but did make the call for more research to be done.
The following are some details on the European study:
The study aims to track a minimum ¼ million in the five countries for a time period of up to 30 years of time. In addition to that some other studies are centered on asking people that have already contracted cancer about their prior cell phone usage. These types of studies are obviously shorter as cell phones have only been used on a wide scale for around the past decade.
There is a long way to go with this and the question is that should we put some warning labels on cell phones and take some proactive measures as the details of this study will come in a little too late for many people should the results find a cancer link. The other question is will the United States ever become involved in this study or an individual one.
Those questions are yet to be answered.

Related posts:

  1. CELL PHONES – Good or Bad for Our Health?
  2. A Proposed Law Would Require Warning Labels for Cell Phones
  3. Mobile Phone and Cancer Research Has Run Its Course…For Now
  4. Study Shows That Multitasking Is Taking a Toll on Short-Term Memory Function
  5. Is Using a Cell Phone Safe
  6. Link between Brain Cancer and Cell Phone Use Inconclusive
  7. From Applications to Texting, Using Cell Phones for Health
  8. Apple Rejects Application That Would Gauge iPhone Radiation Levels
  9. Cell Phone Radiation Law Approved In San Francisco
  10. Advocates of Cell Phone Safety Call On the FDA and FCC to Update both Rules and Radiation Standards

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Additional Blog Links

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • April 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • Categories
  • 2048 Bit SSL Certificate